Sunday, September 13, 2020

Nyaya Panchayat: Basic understandings By Dr.Debarati Halder

http://www.cybervictims.org Dr.Debarati Halder


Image courtesy: Internet 

What is Nyaya Panchayat?

India has a rich history of justice administration system. Nyaya Panchayat  is a form of grassroot level justice administration system in India which has existed since the ancient period. Traces of Nyaya Panchayat may also be found in Kautilya’s Artha Shashtra . In the contemporary justice administration system, Nyaya Panchayat finds its place in the bottom strata of court system: the Supreme court being the highest court in the country , the High Courts in the  states are the highest of courts of appeals in the State level, which are above the lower judiciary, i.e., the courts of sessions, judicial magistrate’s court. Hierarchy wise, Taluka courts are the lowest levels of the courts which have judicial magistrates as judges. All these courts mentioned above have judges who are trained judicial magistrates and come from proper legal background. In cases of Supreme court and High courts, judges are appointed by way of collegium system from among the senior judges from high courts and senior lawyers from the bar (in cases of Supreme court and high courts) and experienced senior judicial magistrates from the lower judiciary (especially in cases of high courts). Such candidates must fulfil prescribed qualifications and time period as practitioners. Nyaya Panchayat fall in the lowest strata in this regard which are basically ‘village courts. They are not headed by trained judicial magistrates. They are headed by elected representatives from among the villages. Generally, the Sarpanch  heads the  Nyaya panchayat.   In the ancient and medieval periods, the post of Sarpanch used to pass on a hereditary basis. But in the modern time, this post is given to the elective representative.

Unique features of Nyaya Panchayat:

Nyaya Panchayat has got some unique features: this is not a regular court, nut a village level justice delivery body where resolution of disputes happens in the presence of five elected representatives who are known as panchas (five). This body is headed by Sarpanch who is assisted by Sahayak Sarpanch. Generally, the dispute resolution mechanism follows alternative dispute resolution mechanisms including mediation, conciliation etc, but in a very informal way. Mediation may not follow legal process. There is no presence of lawyers in such Nyaya Panchayats and these Nyaya Panchayats may try only petty cases. They are not eligible to pass penal sentences as we get to see in Penal Codes: instead, they may use sanctions like social boycott, Fine, order to return of the stolen item etc.

Advantages and disadvantages of Nyaya Panchayat:

While in one way these Nyaya Panchayats proved advantageous for speedy justice especially for restitution of justice for petty cases, on the other hand, the justice delivery system is done by untrained body. Hence it has been often observed that justice delivery system and the sanctions are baseless, arbitrary and  corruptive. Such justice delivery system may do more harm than good.

Modernisation of Nyaya Panchayat system:

Since independence in 1947, the government has taken steps to modernise nyaya panchayat system by introducing Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. S.42 of this Act states that the State Government or the prescribed authority shall divide a district into circles, each circle comprising as many areas subject to the jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat as may be expedient, and establish Nyaya Panchayat of each such circle. It further says that the areas of Gram Panchayat within each circle shall, as far as possible be contiguous. This Section also prescribes the number of members to a minimum of ten and a maximum of twenty-five. It further mentions that the number of the members should not be less than two-thirds of the prescribed strength.

Appointment of Panaches and their term is mentioned in S.43, which states that members of Nyaya Panchayat  should be appointed by the prescribed authority out of the members of a Gram Panchayat. The  number of persons should be such, as may be prescribed. These members should cease to be member of the Gram Panchayat and their seats in the Gram Panchayat shall be filled as per the provisions of this statute. This section further says that if the requisite number of members of a Gram Panchayat are not available for being Panches of the Nyaya Panchayat, it shall be lawful for the prescribed authority to fill in any seat so remaining vacant by nomination from amongst other members of the Gram Panchayat. All such candidates must possess prescribed qualifications as prescribed by the competent authority. S 44 speaks about the election of the sarpanch for nyaya panchayat and says the Panches appointed under Section 43 shall, in the manner and within the period to be prescribed, elect from amongst them two persons who are able to record proceedings, one as the Sarpanch and the other as the Sahayak Sarpanch; the proviso attached with this section further says  if the Panches fail to elect the Sarpanch or the Sahayak as aforesaid the prescribed authority may appoint the Sarpanch or the Sahayak Sarpanch.

Bench of Nyaya Panchayat and limitations: S.49 of this Act speaks about the bench of Nyaya Panchayat and says  that the Sarpanch shall form Benches consisting of five Panches each for the disposal of cases and inquiries coming up before the Nyaya Panchayat.The formation of Benches, the period for which they will work including the hearing of part heard cases, the method of distribution, transfer or re-transfer of work among the Benches and procedure generally to be followed by them in cases and enquiries shall be governed by rules. the State Government may prescribe the constitution of Special Benches for the trial of any class or classes of cases; the State Government may at any time order for the reconstitution of such Special Bench. Any dispute relating to the formation of Benches or method of their working, shall be referred to the prescribed authority whose decision shall be final

This section strictly states that no Panch, Sarpanch or Sahayak Sarpanch shall take part in the trial of or inquiry in any case to which he or any relation, employer, employee debtor, creditor or partner of his is a party or in which any of this is personally interested.

Powers and jurisdiction of Nyaya Panchayat:

Nyaya Panchayat can take up both criminal and civil matters but these must be of the nature of petty cases.

Jurisdiction :

This statute indicates that all  criminal cases triable by a Nyaya Panchayat shall be instituted before the Sarpanch of the Nyaya Panchayat where  the offence is committed. Similarly, all  civil case shall be instituted before the Sarpanch of the Nyaya Panchayat where the defendant or, where there are more than one, all the defendants ordinarily reside or carry on business at the time of the institution of the civil case irrespective of the place where the cause of action arose.

S.52 of the Panchayati Raj Act mentions about the offences that may be tried by the Nyaya Panchayat and these are as follows:

(a) Offences under section 140, 160, 172, 174, 179, 269, 277, 283, 285,289, 290, 294, 324, 334, 341, 352, 357, 358, 374, 379, 403, 411 (where the value of the stolen or misappropriated property in cases unde rSections 379, 403 and 411 does not exceed fifty rupees), 4276, 428,430, 431, 447, 448, 504, 506, 509, and 510 of the Indian Penal Code,1860;

(b) Offences under sections 24 and 26 of the Cattle Trespass Act, 1871;

(c) Offences under sub-section (1) of 10 of the United Provinces District Board Primary Education Act, 1926;

(d) Offences under Section 3, 4, 7 and 13 of the Public Grambling Act, 1867.

(e) Any other offence under aforesaid enactments or any other enactment as may, by notification in the official Gazette, be declared by the State Government to be cognizable by a Nyaya Panchayat; and

(f) Any offence under this Act or any rule made thereunder

This provision further mentions that the State Government may by order published in the Official Gazette empower any Nyaya Panchayat to take cognizance of offences under Section 279,286, 336 and 356 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and may likewise withdraw any offence referred to in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) from the cognizance of Nyaya Panchayats generally or such Nyaya Panchayats as may be specified. Further, any court may also transfer some cases to Nyaya Panchayat especially relating to an offence under Section 143, 145, 151 or 153 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending before any court, if in the opinion of such court the offence is not serious.

S.55 discusses about the cognizance of the cases by Nyaya Panchayat. As we discussed above that such panchayats can take care of petty cases, the section states that  After a Nyaya Panchayat has been established for any area, no Court except as otherwise provided in this Act shall take cognizance of any case triable by such Nyaya Panchayat.  When a Nyaya Panchayat is suspended, superseded or dissolved under Section 95, or for any other reason ceases to function all cases pending before it shall stand transferred to the Court of competent jurisdiction which shall dispose them of according to law; It further says that  the trial of all such cases in Court shall commence de novo, i.e., right of the beginning afresh.

Transfer of cases by courts to Nyaya Panchayat and viceversa:

S. 56 speaks about transfer of cases by Courts to Nyaya Panchayat  and says  a Court if it finds that a case is triable by a Nyaya Panchayat, shall, except as provided in sub-section(4) of Section 55 transfer the case to the Nyaya Panchayat of competent jurisdiction which shall thereafter try the same de novo.S.57 speaks about summary dismissal of complaint and says a Nyaya Panchayat may dismiss any complaint if after examining the complainant and taking such evidence as he produces it is satisfied that the complaint is frivolous, vexatious or untrue.

When should Naya Panchayat transfer cases to courts?

Nyaya Panchayat may transfer cases to courts under following circumstances:

i.               it has no jurisdiction to try any case pending before it.

ii.             the offence involved is one for which it cannot award adequate punishment, or

iii.           the case should other wise be tried by a court;

In all such cases parties to be given information of such transfer to the parties concerned.

S.59 of this Act however provides the list of the cases where Nyaya Panchayat may not have any jurisdiction. It states that no Nyaya Panchayat shall take cognizance of any criminal case against a person where such person

(a) has been previously convicted of an offence punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term of three years or more.

(b) has been previously fined for theft by any Nyaya Panchayat.

(c) has been found over to be of a good behaviour under Sections 109 or 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(d)has been previously convicted under the Public Gambling Act, 1867,

(e) is a public servant.

What sort of penalties may be prescribed by Naya Panchayat?

S54 discusses about this and says as follows:

(1) No Nyaya Panchayat shall inflict a substantive sentence of imprisonment.

(2) A Nyaya Panchayat may impose a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty rupees but not imprisonment may be awarded in default of payment;

No accused shall be tried for more than three offences in the same criminal case and the fine that may be imposed on any one accused in a criminal case shall not in the aggregate exceed two hundred and fifty rupees.

Does Naya Panchayat have any power for restitution of justice for accused persons? The answer is YES. S61 discusses about Compensation to the accused  and says :

(1) If any criminal case instituted before a Nyaya Panchayat any person is accused of any offence triable by a Nyaya Panchayatand the Nyaya Panchayat acquits the accused and is of the opinion that the accusation against him was false and either frivolous or vexatious, the Nyaya Panchayat may call upon the complainant forthwith to show cause why he should not pay compensation to such accused.

(2) If after hearing the complainant, the Nyaya Panchayat is satisfied that the accusation was false and either frivolous or vexatious, it may direct that compensation not exceeding twenty-five rupees be paid by such complainant to the accused.

S.62 also discusses about Nyaya Panchayt’s power to  release of offenders on probation  and says  the powers under Section 4 of theU.P. First Offenders Probation Act, 1938, may be exercised by a Nyaya Panchayat.

The other functions of the Nyaya Panchayat:

S53 discusses about Security for keeping the peace and states (1) Wherever the Sarpanch of a Nyaya Panchayat has reason to apprehend that any person is likely to commit a breach of peace or disturb public tranquility, he may call upon such person to show cause how he should not execute a bond or an amount not exceeding Rs. 100 with or without sureties for keeping the peace for a period not exceeding 15 days.

(2) The Sarpanch shall after issue of such notice report the matter to a Bench.The Bench may either confirm the order or discharge the notice after hearing such person and such witnesses as he may desire to produce.

(3) If the person required to execute a bond as aforesaid under sub-section (2) fails to do so, he shall be liable to pay a penalty up to five rupees as the Bench may fix for every day if the default continues during the period fixed in the order.

Can Nyaya Panchayat take up civil matters? The answer is YES. In this matter the followings must be considered:

a Nyaya Panchayat may take cognizance of any civil case of the following description if its value does not exceed one hundred rupees –

a) a civil case for money due on contract other than a contract in respect of immovable property;

(b) a civil case for the recovery of movable property or for the value thereof;

(c) a civil case for compensation for wrongfully taking or injuring a movable property; and

(d) a civil case for damages caused by cattle trespass.

But Nyaya Panchayat shall have no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the following civil cases

(1) a civil case for a balance due on partnership account, except where the balance has been struck by the parties or their agents;

(2) a civil case for a share or part of a share under an intestacy or for a legacy or part of a legacy under a will;

(3) a civil case by or against the State Government or the Central Government or a public servant for acts done in his official capacity;

(4) a civil case by or against a minor or a person of unsound mind, and

(5) a civil case the cognizance of which by a Panchayat established under U.P. Village Panchayat Act, 1920, is barred by Section 25 of the United Provinces Debt Redemption Act, 1940.

S,69 discusses about the effects of the decisions of the nyaya panchayat and states that the decision of Nyaya Panchayat on the question of the title, legal character contract or obligation shall not bind the parties except in respect of the civil case in which such matter is decided and no conviction ordered by a Nyaya Panchayat shall by itself operate as, or be the basis of any disqualification or penalty under any law for the time being in force. a Nyaya Panchayat shall also have no power to cancel, revise or alter any decree or order passed by it. A Nyaya Panchayat may, for sufficient reasons to be recorded, on application made within one month of the date of the decree or order or knowledge thereof in case personal service of summons has not been effected, restore any civil or criminal case which has been dismissed in default or in which a decree or order has been passed ex parte.(as mentioned in S.79 of the Panchayat Raj Act).

It must however be remembered that Nyaya Panchayat and Khap Panchayat are not the same. While Nyaya Panchayat has a legal recognition and its functions are regulated by laws, khap panchayats do not find any support from laws and may not be legal.

 


Monday, August 17, 2020

Setting up free Legal aid clinic by Law students and becoming a paralegal volunteer under the NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (LEGAL AID CLINICS) SCHEME, 2010 by Dr.Debarati Halder

http://www.cybervictims.org

Debarati Halder

During the Lock down for Covid -19, the people belonging to the below the poverty line (BPL) had been affected hugely. Covid- 19 lock down had caused economic slowdown at its worst. Several people have lost their job. Women have also been worst hit as most of them in the middle-income group level had been financially dependent on their husbands. Staying at home, working from home situations and loss of jobs had triggered domestic violence as well. In this children had also been affected: the  school campuses had remained closed and most of the private schools had taken to online teaching mode. But children from socio-economically poor sections may not access and exercise their right to education as they may not have access to digital devices like their counter parts from socio-economically better sections. The Constitution of India had however extended its benevolent scope to cover such emergency situations especially for beneficiaries for free legal aid that had been categorised under S.12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. It may be seen that free legal aid cell of the District/State/National legal services authorities and  free legal aid  clinics setup by law schools may also render help for the beneficiaries categorized under the above mentioned provision. The Constitution under the Directive Principles of State Policy(Chapter IV) emphasizes the duties of State to support all citizens including the beneficiaries of free legal aid. This chapter extends its scope even for situations like this pandemic.   Article 39A  of the Indian Constitution is specially mentionable in this regard. It speaks about easy access to justice for all and it is an essential part of Directive principles of State policy. This provision implies that free legal aid should be provided to all beneficiaries. In the landmark case of Hussainara Khatoon v.Home Secretary,State of Bihar [(1980) 1 SCC98], It was held that all beneficiaries including the accused who may be financially not capable to hiring a defence lawyer, must be provided free legal aid. This implies that the State is duty bound to set up free legal aid clinics in all important places and organisations  rendering public services including hospitals, jails etc.

The question which arises here is, can the law students setup free legal aid clinic? Whether they can render their services as pro bono counselors? Whether they can be considered as para legal volunteers? who else can be eligible to become para legal volunteers? Can the law students provide free legal advice?

In the case of Forum for Social Justice v. State of Kerala &Another (High Court of Kerala) ILR 2009(4)Kerala456, 2009(3)KLJ538, 2009(4)KLT176, it was held that once the Legal services Authorities Act, 1987 has been enacted, no other government department except the National Legal Services Authorities may provide accreditation to the free legal aid clinics setup by the private organisations/voluntary organisations etc.

As such, the   NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (LEGAL AIDCLINICS) SCHEME, 2010, adopted by the Central Authority of NALSA speaks about infrastructure, setting up of legal aid clinics, eligibility of paralegal volunteers (PLV), works of such  PLVs and legal aid clinics, which may include providing legal advice, drafting of petitions etc, and providing mechanism for  resolving the disputes of local beneficiaries in the prelitigation stage etc. This Scheme also provides that free legal aid clinics shall refer disputes of higher level to the  nearest District /Taluk legal services Authorities. The scheme clearly mentions that the free legal aid clinics should be situated at convenient places for public and should have proper infrastructure which would provide sitting arrangements for beneficiaries especially women and children, senior citizens, disabled persons etc.  This scheme also encourages village panchayat offices to accommodate free legal aid clinics. Further, the scheme mandates that the free legal aid clinics should have sign-board both in English and the local language showing  the name of the legal aid clinic, working hours etc. The free legal aid clinics should ber connected with the nearest District/taluk legal services institution having territorial jurisdiction and such DLSA/Taluk legal services authorities   may maintain a panel of lawyers from whom selected lawyers may be sent to such legal aid clinics on rotation basis for rendering legal opinions/advises and in certain cases for amicable resolution of disputes in the ADR mechanism ways.  Such lawyers may also request the nearest DLSA /Taluk legal services authorities to refer the dispute to Lok Adalat for a pre-litigation settlement according to sub-section (2) of Section 20 Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 is complied with. The nearest legal services institution having territorial jurisdiction/ District Legal Services Authority may organise Lok Adalat at the legal aid clinic or near to its premises. The scheme also mentions about  using Mobile Lok Adalat Van which may be used to bring  the members of the LokAdalat Bench for the purpose of alternative dispute resolution. The van may also be used for the legal services, providing access to health clinics, other government offices etc  to disabled persons, mentally ill persons and children.

The scheme mentions that any individuals above the age of 18 may apply for becoming paralegal volunteer and they may be selected for the same provided they have  interest in social causes. Such PLVs may be selected  and trained by the DLSA and Taluk Legal services authorities  and they  may be engaged in  the legal aid clinics including free legal aid clinics in the law schools for assisting the panel advocates and the beneficiaries of free legal aid. They may also help in drafting simple petitions, letters, applications etc. They may also accompany the beneficiaries of free legal aid to different government offices for exercising their rights etc.  However, it is not necessary for PLVs to have law degrees. But they may be encouraged to get law degrees to understand  the laws, legal rights etc. Such PLVs may also help the legal aid clinics in law for assisting the beneficiaries for interacting with the students and the faculty members of the law schools. The scheme mandates that all PLVs and panel advocates shall record their attendance in the register maintained in the legal aid clinic. Such registers should also have name, address and brief case details of the beneficiaries and the record of suggestions provided by the panel advocates. It should also have the signatures of seekers of legal aid and the lawyers. All such records shall be under the custody of the Secretary of the Taluk Legal Services Committee/District Legal Services Authority.

The scheme further provides that law colleges, law schools and universities should also setup free legal aid clinics and this can be done irrespective of whether the college/school /university is government aided or a private institution. Such free legal aid clinics may be connected with nearest DLSA or Taluk legal services authorities. But only the final year students may be eligible to render legal services under the monitoring of faculties. The junior students may however assist them. This scheme also states that such senior students may also setup their own free legal clinic following the guidelines of the scheme. Further, the law students should also adopt villages especially in the remote areas. such students must organise legal aid camps, spread awareness about legal rights, government policies, schemes etc and must as sit beneficiaries to access justice. However when the students of law receive their license to practice, they may cease to be para legal volunteers. But this would not deter them to render probono services in such free legal aid clinics as lawyers. They may need to be connected with the Local DLSA or taluk legal services authorities for enlisting themselves as panel advocates. However, they should not charge for their services and should be completely based on their interest for social cause. The legal services authorities however may pay them honorarium for their services.  

Please cite it as Halder Debarati (2020)  Setting up free Legal aid clinic by Law students and becoming a paralegal volunteer under the NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (LEGAL AID CLINICS) SCHEME, 2010  published on 17th August, 2020 @https://victimologybydebarati.blogspot.com/2020/08/setting-up-free-legal-aid-clinic-by-law.html

 


Sunday, May 10, 2020

Rights of the arrested persons under Criminal Procedure Code : Simplified understanding by Dr.Debarati Halder

http://www.cybervictims.org


Before understanding the rights of the arrested persons, we must understand that there are some hairline differences between rights of the accused persons and rights of the arrested persons.  ‘Accused persons’ is a broader term which includes arrested persons. But accused persons can include persons who are accused of committing civil offences, petty offences etc, where arrest may not be made. Accused person’s rights may include six   broad rights :
ü Right to defend himself
ü Right to get legal aid and legal counselling
ü Right to fair hearing and principles of natural justice
ü Right to bail (in case the accused person is accused of any bailable offences)
ü Right against arbitrary arrest and detention where such arrest and detention are not necessary.
ü Rights against custodial torture.

The relationship between the two terms may be shown through the following diagram:












Arrested persons on the other hand may necessarily mean those who may have committed offences in the category of cognizable offences or non-cognizable offences where arrest may necessarily be made.


In the Criminal Procedure Code, Law of arrest has been discussed mainly under Chapter 5 (Ss 41-60A). Rights of the arrested persons is an inherent part of law of arrest. This right can be studied under following heads: 


S.41 of the Cr.P.C discusses about when arrest may be done made without warrant by the police. This section provides the following conditions when such arrest may be made:

(1) Any police officer may without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant, arrest any person-
(a) who has been concerned in any cognizable offence, or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, of his having been so concerned; or
(b) who has in his possession without lawful excuse, the burden of proving which excuse shall lie on such person, any implement of house- breaking; or
(c) who has been proclaimed as an offender either under this Code or by order of the State Government; or
(d) in whose possession anything is found which may reasonably be suspected to be stolen property and who may reasonably be suspected of having committed an offence with reference to such thing; or
(e) who obstructs a police officer while in the execution of his duty, or who has escaped, or attempts to escape, from lawful custody; or
(f) who is reasonably suspected of being a deserter from any of the Armed Forces of the Union; or
(g) who has been concerned in, or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, of his having been concerned in, any act committed at any place out of India which, if committed in India, would have been punishable as an offence, and for which he is, under any law relating to extradition, or otherwise, liable to be apprehended or detained in custody in India; or
(h) who, being a released convict, commits a breach of any rule made under sub- section (5) of section 356(which speaks about The State Government may, by notification, make rules to carry out the provisions of this section relating to the notification of residence or change of, or absence from, residence by released convicts.); or
(i) for whose arrest any requisition, whether written or oral, has been received from another police officer, provided that the requisition specifies the person to be arrested and the offence or other cause for which the arrest is to be made and it appears therefrom that the person might lawfully be arrested without a warrant by the officer who issued the requisition.

Further Section 41A of Cr.P.C also discusses as when arrest may and may  not be made. It says that “the police officer may, in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 41, issue a notice directing the person against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed a cognizable offence, to appear before him or at such other place as may be specified in the notice.” It further says “Where such a notice is issued to any person, it shall be the duty of that person to comply with the terms of the notice.” In such cases, arrests may not be made technically.
But, it further says “Where such person complies and continues to comply with the notice, he shall not be arrested in respect of the offence referred to in the notice unless, for reasons to be recorded, the police officer is of the opinion that he ought to be arrested”. It again says, “Where such person, at any time, fails to comply with the terms of the notice, it shall be lawful for the police officer to arrest him for the offence mentioned in the notice, subject to such orders as may have been passed in this behalf by a competent Court”. In such cases, arrest may be made.

S.42 of the Cr.P.C further lays down another ground for arrest : it says, “When any person who, in the presence of a police officer, has committed or has been accused of committing a non-cognizable offence refuses, on demand of such officer, to give his name and residence or gives a name or residence which such officer has reason to believe to be false, he may be arrested by such officer in order that his name or residence may be ascertained.”. It further says “When the true name and residence of such person have been ascertained, he shall be released on his executing a bond, with or without sureties, to appear before a Magistrate if so required”:
Provided that, if such person is not resident in India, the bond shall be secured by a surety or sureties resident in India.
Should the true name and residence of such person not be ascertained within twenty-four hours from the time of arrest or should he fail to execute the bond, or, if so required, to furnish sufficient sureties, he shall forthwith be forwarded to the nearest Magistrate having jurisdiction.

However, the rights of the arrested persons remained ignored for a long time. In the case of D.K. Basu vs State of West Bengal , AIR 1997, SC 610(623), The courts laid down certain guidelines that could be taken as rights of the arrested persons. These are as follows:
(1) The police personnel carrying out the arrest and handling the interrogation of the arrestee should bear accurate, visible and clear identification and name togs with their designations. The particulars of all such police personnel who handle interrogation of the arrestee must be recorded in a register.

(2) That the police officer carrying out the arrest of the arrestee shall prepare a memo of arrest at the time of arrest a such memo shall be attested by atleast one witness. who may be either a member of the family of the arrestee or a respectable person of the locality from where the arrest is made. It shall also be counter signed by the arrestee and shall contain the time and date of arrest.
 (3) A person who has been arrested or detained and is being held in custody in a police station or interrogation centre or other lock-up, shall be entitled to have one friend or relative or other person known to him or having interest in his welfare being informed, as soon as practicable, that he has been arrested and is being detained at the particular place, unless the attesting witness of the memo of arrest is himself such a friend or a relative of the arrestee.
(4) The time, place of arrest and venue of custody of an arrestee must be notified by the police where the next friend or relative of the arrestee lives outside the district or town through the legal Aid Organisation in the District and the police station of the area concerned telegraphically within a period of 8 to 12 hours after the arrest.

(5) The person arrested must be made aware of this right to have someone informed of his arrest or detention as soon he is put under arrest or is detained.
6) An entry must be made in the diary at the place of detention regarding the arrest of the person which shall also disclose the name of he next friend of the person who has been informed of the arrest an the names and particulars of the police officials in whose custody the arrestee is.
 (7) The arrestee should, where he so requests, be also examined at the time of his arrest and major and minor injuries, if any present on his/her body, must be recorded at that time. The "Inspection Memo" must be signed both by the arrestee and the police officer effecting the arrest and its copy provided to the arrestee.

(8) The arrestee should be subjected to medical examination by trained doctor every 48 hours during his detention in custody by a doctor on the panel of approved doctors appointed by Director, Health Services of the concerned Stare or Union Territory. Director, Health Services should prepare such a panel  for all Tehsils and Districts as well.
(9) Copies of all the documents including the memo of arrest, referred to above, should be sent to the illaqa Magistrate for his record.

(10) The arrestee may be permitted to meet his lawyer during interrogation, though not throughout the interrogation.
(11) A police control room should be provided at all district and state headquarters, where information regarding the arrest and the place of custody of the arrestee shall be communicated by the officer causing the arrest, within 12 hours of effecting the arrest and at the police control room it should be displayed on a conspicuous notice board.


The guidelines of D.K. Basu case had been incorporated in Chapter 5 through the following Sections:
Ø Section 41B – Procedure of arrest and duties of officer making arrest: Every police officer while making an arrest shall,- bear an accurate, visible and clear identification of his name which will facilitate easy identification; prepare a memorandum of arrest which shall be,- attested by at least one witness, who is a member of the family of the person arrested or a respectable member of the locality where the arrest is made; countersigned by the person arrested; and inform the person arrested, unless the memorandum is attested by a member of his family, that he has a right to have a relative or a friend named by him to be informed of his arrest.
Ø Section 41C – Control room at districts: The State Government shall establish a police control room, in every district; and at State level. The State Government shall cause to be displayed on the notice board kept outside the control rooms at every district, the names and addresses of the persons arrested and the name and designation of the police officers who made the arrests. The control room at the Police Headquarters at the State level shall collect from time to time, details about the persons arrested, nature of the offence with which they are charged and maintain a database for the information of the general public.
Ø Section 41D – Right of arrested person to meet an advocate of his choice during interrogation: When any person is arrested and interrogated by the police, he shall be entitled to meet an advocate of his choice during interrogation, though not throughout interrogation.
Rights of arrested persons must also include discussions on immunities for members and armed forces and judicial officers. S. 45 of CrPC in this regard says “Notwithstanding anything contained in sections 41 to 44 (both inclusive), no member of the Armed Forces of the Union shall be arrested for anything done or purported to be done by him in the discharge of his official duties except after obtaining the consent of the Central Government. The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of Sub-Section (1) shall apply to such class or category of the members of the Force charged with the maintenance of public order as may be specified therein, wherever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of that Sub-Section shall apply as if for the expression “Central Government” occurring therein, the expression “State Government” were substituted.” One of the good examples could be the case of Jammu and Kashmir human shield case where the army official who was allegedly considered as the person who directed to tie a man with the jeep, was not tried by regular courts. In case of arrest of judicial officers, Cr.P.C does not offer any specific guidelines. But in the case of Delhi Judicial service association vs State of Gujarat AIR 1991 SC 2176, it was observed that arrest of judicial officer must be done under intimation to the District Judge or the High court. In case of need for immediate arrest a technical or formal arrest may be effected and Such arrest may be communicated immediately to district and sessions judge & chief Justice of the concerned high court.
Now comes the question as how arrests should be made? S.46 of the Cr.P.C provides the answer which says that arrest must be made by touching the body of the person, which in clear terms means confining the person. This Section says as follows:
In making an arrest the police officer or other person making the same shall actually touch or confine the body of the person to be arrested, unless there be a submission to the custody by word or action. If such person forcibly resists the endeavour to arrest him, or attempts to evade the arrest, such police officer or other person may use all means necessary to effect the arrest. Nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for life.
We therefore get to see that if the accused is trying to escape from the arrest, the police officer can use some force. But S.46 prohibits using any force which may cause death or grave bodily injury especially to accused persons who are not charged with offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.
However, when a woman is to be arrested, this provision further states as followed:
Provided that where a woman is to be arrested, unless the circumstances indicate to the contrary, her submission to custody on an oral intimation of arrest shall be presumed.  Only female police officers may execute the physical arrest and male  police officer shall not touch the person of the woman for making her arrest.

Now, coming to the apprehension of children who are in conflict with law, the criminal justice machinery has to follow Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act, 2015, read with Chapter 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The three points that must be remembered in this regard are as follows:
ü Arrest must not be made until and unless it is necessary to detain the child
ü Arrest must be done by SJPU. Female police officers are given priority in such cases 
ü Police officer must act as the guardian of the child until he has been submitted to the observation home or  is submitted to his parents etc after admonishing/bail

The Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act read with Chapter 5 of the Cr.P.C further emphasizes  the following rights :
Medical examination
Right to legal aid 
No custodial torture
Justice in the interest of child

Rights of the arrestee also includes certain duties of the police officers. Let us now look into these duties and rights in the following Sections:
Arrests made under S.47:
What can be done when an offender escapes from arrest and hides in any property ?
police officer should be allowed free ingress thereto, and afford all reasonable facilities for a search therein.


What happens when such ingress may not made ?
Police officer can  break open any outer or inner door or window of any house or place,
What happens when such place is an apartment and in occupancy of a woman including Pardanashin woman ?
She should be allowed to withdraw and police may then break open the apartment and enter it.
What happens when the police or any other person empowered with a duty to arrest the offender, is detained in a place
Any police officer or other person authorised to make an arrest may break open any outer or inner door or window of any house.

When can search be made of arrested persons ?
Section 51 discusses about Search of arrested persons and it says as follows:

Whenever a person is arrested by a police officer under a warrant which does not provide for the taking of bail,  or under a warrant which provides for the taking of bail but the person Arrested cannot furnish bail, and whenever a person is arrested without warrant, or by a private person under a warrant, and cannot legally be admitted to bail, or is unable to furnish bail search can be made
It further says,
The officer making the arrests or, when the arrest is made by a private person, the police officer to whom he makes over the person arrested, may search such person, and place in safe custody all articles, other than necessary wearing-apparel, found upon him and where any article is seized from the arrested person, a receipt showing the articles taken in possession by the police officer shall be given to such person.


What happens when a female offender needs to be searched ?
Whenever it is necessary to cause a female to be searched, the search shall be made by another female with strict regard to decency.

There are also several duties of police officers to ensure rights of the arrested persons who is making the arrest. These are as follows:
ü Section 49 (No unnecessary restraint) :The person arrested shall not be subjected to more restraint than is necessary to prevent his escape.
ü Section 50( Person arrested to be informed of grounds of arrest and of right to bail): Every police officer or other person arresting any person without warrant shall forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested or other grounds for such arrest. Where a police officer arrests without warrant any person other than a person accused of a non-bailable offence, he shall inform the person arrested that he is entitled to be released on bail and that he may arrange for sureties on his behalf.
ü Section 50A Obligation of person making arrest to inform about the arrest to inform about the arrest, etc., to a nominated person:
     Every police officer or other person making any arrest under this Code shall forthwith give the information regarding such arrest and place where the arrested person is being held to any of his friends, relatives or such other persons as may be disclosed or nominated by the arrested person for the purpose of giving such information.
     The police officer shall inform the arrested person of his rights under subsection (1) as soon as he is brought to the police station.
     An entry of the fact as to who has been informed of the arrest of such person shall be made in a book to be kept in the police station in such form as may be prescribed in this behalf by the State Government.
               It shall be the duty of the Magistrate before whom such arrested person is produced, to satisfy himself that the requirements of Sub-Section (2) and Sub-Section (3) have been complied with in respect of such arrested person.
ü Section 55A – Health and safety of arrested person: It shall be the duty of the person having the custody of an accused to take reasonable care of the health and safety of the accused.
ü Duties of police officer to ensure medical test of the arrested persons under specific circumstances:
ü Section 53 – Examination of accused by medical practitioner at the request of police officer: When a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence of such a nature and alleged to have been committed under such circumstances that there are reasonable grounds for believing that an examination of his person will afford evidence as to the commission of an offence, it shall be lawful for a registered medical practitioner, acting at the request of a police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector, and for any person acting in good faith in his aid and under his direction, to make such an examination of the person arrested as is reasonable necessary in order to ascertain the facts which may afford such evidence, and to use such force as is reasonably necessary for that purpose.
Whenever the person of a female is to be examined under this section, the examination shall be made only by, or under the supervision of, a female registered medical practitioner.
ü Section 53A – Examination of person accused of rape by medical practitioner
When a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence of rape or an attempt to commit rape and there are reasonable grounds for believing that an examination of his person will afford evidence as to the commission of such offence, it shall be lawful for a registered medical practitioner employed in a hospital run by the Government or by a local authority and in the absence of such a practitioner within the radius of sixteen kilometers from the place where the offence has been committed by any other registered medical practitioner, acting at the request of a police officer not below the rank of a sub-inspector, and for any person acting in good faith in his aid and under his direction, to make such an examination of the arrested person and to use such force as is reasonably necessary for that purpose.
The registered medical practitioner conducting such examination shall, without delay, examine such person and prepare a report of his examination giving the following particulars, namely-
the name and address of the accused and of the person by whom he was brought,
the age of the accused,
marks of injury, if any, on the person of the accused,
the description of material taken from the person of the accused for DNA profiling, and”.
other material particulars in reasonable detail.
The report shall state precisely the reasons for each conclusion arrived at.
The exact time of commencement and completion of the examination shall also be noted in the report.
The registered medical practitioner shall, without delay, forward the report of the investigating officer, who shall forward it to the Magistrate referred to in section 173 as part of the documents referred to in clause (a) of Sub-Section (5) of that section.
ü Medical examination in other cases
ü Section 54 – Examination of arrested person by medical officer
When any person is arrested, he shall be examined by a medical officer in the service of Central or State Government, and in case the medical officer is not available, by a registered medical practitioner soon after the arrest is made;
The medical officer or a registered medical practitioner so examining the arrested person shall prepare the record of such examination, mentioning therein any injuries or marks of violence upon the person arrested, and the approximate time when such injuries or marks may have been inflicted.
Where an examination is made under sub-section (1), a copy of the report of such examination shall be furnished by the medical officer or registered medical practitioner, as the case may be, to the arrested person or the person nominated by such arrested person.
Provided that where the arrested person is a female, the examination of the body shall be made only by or under the supervision of a female medical officer, and in case the female medical officer is not available, by a female registered medical practitioner.

ü Other essential duties of police officer towards arrested person
ü Immediate production of the arrested person before magistrate :
ü S.56– Person arrested to be taken before Magistrate or officer in charge of police station : A police officer making an arrest without warrant shall, without unnecessary delay and subject to the provisions herein contained as to bail, take or send the person arrested before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case, or before the officer in charge of a police station.

ü No detention beyond 24 hours :
ü Section 57 – No police officer shall detain in custody a person arrested without warrant for a longer period than under all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, and such period shall not, in the absence of a special order of a Magistrate under section 167, exceed twenty-four hours exclusive of the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the Magistrate’s Court.
Reporting about apprehension, bail etc to Executive magistrates
ü Section 58 – Police to report apprehensions: Officers in charge of police stations shall report to the District Magistrate, or, if he so directs, to the Sub-divisional Magistrate, the cases of all persons arrested without warrant, within the limits of their respective stations, whether such persons have been admitted to bail or otherwise

ü How to ensure identity of the arrested person?
ü Section 54A – Identification of person arrested
Where a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence and his identification by any other person or persons is considered necessary for the purpose of investigation of such offence, the Court, having jurisdiction, may on the request of the officer in charge of a police station, direct the person so arrested to subject himself to identification by any person or persons in such manner as the Court may deem fit.
Provided that, if the person identifying the person arrested is mentally or physically disabled, such process of identification shall take place under the supervision of a Judicial Magistrate who shall take appropriate steps to ensure that such person identifies the person arrested using methods that person is comfortable with. The identification process shall be video graphed

ü Specific obligations under the Criminal Procedure Code for arrest:


Please Note:
Please don't violate the copyright of this blog. Please cite it as Halder Debarati (2020). Rights of the arrested persons under Criminal Procedure Code : Simplified understanding . Published on 11-05-2020 @ https://victimologybydebarati.blogspot.com/2020/05/rights-of-arrested-persons-under.html